Re: [Corpora-List] Interlingual Machine Translation Systems (fwd)

From: Bob Parks (bobp@clarityconnect.com)
Date: Sat Nov 20 2004 - 21:12:46 MET

  • Next message: Jean Veronis: "[Corpora-List] Call: Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech 2005"

    Professor Wilks,
    So... I am to understand that an appeal for civility in academic
    discourse - especially in the context of intensely felt disagreements
    - is a "slimy, back-handed ad hominem reprimand"? Clearly the "ad
    hominem" isn't of my design. I rest my case, and withdraw from this
    unseemly interaction.
    Bob Parks

    At 5:55 PM +0000 11/20/04, Yorick WIlks wrote:
    >Sorry, we disagree----in my value system slimy, back-handed ad
    >hominem reprimands like this last, copied to the whole list and
    >making no intellectual point at all, are infinitely more damaging to
    >lists and communication than anything i wrote. I was just trying to
    >correct ignorance after many years of seeing MT unfairly slagged
    >off: this email has no defensible point at all.
    >YW
    >
    >
    >On Saturday, November 20, 2004, at 04:43 PM, Bob Parks wrote:
    >
    >>Professor Wilks,
    >>Couldn't an eminent computational linguist of your stature afford
    >>to forego this sort of response? Wouldn't it be sufficient to
    >>disagree?
    >>Bob Parks
    >>
    >>At 3:57 PM +0000 11/20/04, Yorick WIlks wrote:
    >>>This reply from Russia is total nonsense, unless "good" means
    >>>something utterly impractical. There are many evaluated MT systems
    >>>that do a reasonable job (i.e. giving a good indication of what a
    >>>document says) and some are available free on search sites as well
    >>>all know. The world's oldest and strongest system SYSTRAN
    >>>sometimes does a very good job. recommending a 20 word MT system
    >>>shows utter ignorance of the last forty years.
    >>>Yorick Wilks
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>On Friday, November 19, 2004, at 12:18 PM, Sergey Protasov wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>
    >>>>Eric,
    >>>>
    >>>>There are no good MT systems today at all.
    >>>>So there are no good opensource MT systems today.
    >>>>
    >>>>ThoughtTreasure is very big system for teaching and it have bad
    >>>>syntax parser. (It fails, if senstence have more that 7-10 words)
    >>>>
    >>>>I recommend you to see link grammar translator for teaching.
    >>>>http://www.link.cs.cmu.edu/link/submit-to-translator.html
    >>>>It show very good translations, but It have 20 words in vocab only..
    >>>>
    >>>>You can add more words... But it is not trivial...
    >>>>
    >>>>If you intresting in statistical mashine translation, forget I
    >>>>said before and go to here
    >>>>
    >>>>http://www.isi.edu/licensed-sw/rewrite-decoder/
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>It simple, but you will do not know how it works..
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>--
    >>>>Sergey Protasov
    >>>>PhD student in Computational Linguistics,
    >>>>Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>Eric Atwell wrote:
    >>>>>Sergey,
    >>>>>do you have any evaluation report or other evidence of how good
    >>>>>this OpenSource MT system is? Bogdan Babych, researcher here at
    >>>>>Leeds,
    >>>>>is thinking of developing a demo MT system for research and teaching,
    >>>>>but it may be worth considering adapting an existing oepn-source system
    >>>>>regards
    >>>>>Eric Atwell



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 20 2004 - 21:08:09 MET