Re: [Corpora-List] pronunciation

From: Ruvan Weerasinghe (ruvanw@cs.cmu.edu)
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 17:50:58 MET DST

  • Next message: edilog@cogsci.ed.ac.uk: "[Corpora-List] EDILOG 2002: Call for Participation and Demonstrations"

    as a non-native speaker the reason seems rather more 'obvious' to me. all
    basic forms of 'pronounce' including 'pronounceable' have the 'o' in them.
    so, why not 'pronounciation'?

    it appears that it is the latin influence that has been retained for
    'pronunciation' but not for 'pronunce'! if it was the french influence, it
    might have been 'prononciation'?

    > pronunciation (frequency 154) 472 000
    > pronounciation (49) 32 700
    > prononciation (6) 2 370

    conclusion from longman/google: other non-native writers far outnumber the
    french! ;-)

    ruvan.

    At 10:38 AM 7/24/02 +0800, Josephine Lo wrote:
    >Dear all,
    >
    >I'm interested in the word "pronunciation" since recently I noticed that
    >it is quite commonly misspelled as "pronounciation". Is this a common
    >mistake only among non-native speakers? Is is possible that the "o" one
    >would make its way through and eventually replace "pronunciation"?
    >
    >Thank you
    >
    >Josephine Lo



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 27 2002 - 13:36:30 MET DST