Dear Peet and others,
> Everything I've been finding on this subject is as clear as mud, and
> written using terms that I don't understand
I'm not too happy with the usual main-anchor-and-argument-explanations either. I
explained verbal subcategorisation frames to my intro to linguistics students
this morning as the combination of complements (obligatory constituents) a verb
(as head of a VP) takes. I told them that they should try to find out which
constituents the head requires, in other words, try to see which phrases a
lexical item subcategorises for, exemplified by "put" [__ NP PP], "put something
somewhere" (my example was "I put the tape into the machine" FLOB). I then
mentioned that verbs with the same SF may share certain meaning features (e.g.
put and place; "I placed the slide in the viewer" FLOB), pointing towards the
grammar patterns direction. Sorry if this is too simple or not computational
enough.
Best wishes... Ute
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 18 2003 - 21:53:53 MET DST