[Corpora-List] HLT/NAACL 2003 Workshop CFP: Workshop on Text Meaning

From: Priscilla Rasmussen (rasmusse@cs.rutgers.edu)
Date: Tue Feb 11 2003 - 23:12:07 MET

  • Next message: Priscilla Rasmussen: "[Corpora-List] ACL-2003 Workshop CFP: Multilingual & Mixed-language Named Entity Recognition: Combining Statistical and Symbolic Models"

    Workshop on Text Meaning

    Workshop at HLT/NAACL-03

    Saturday, May 31 2003
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Organizers

    Sergei Nirenburg University of Maryland, Baltimore County
    sergei@umbc.edu

    Graeme Hirst University of Toronto gh@cs.toronto.edu

    Workshop Goal

    The main goal of the Workshop on Text Meaning is to re-establish the
    research community of knowledge-based meaning processing and to help to
    explicate the currently implicit treatments of meaning in knowledge-lean
    approaches and how the advances in the latter and in formal semantics
    should influence the task.

    Overview

    Most, if not all, high-end NLP applications - from the earliest, MT, to
    the latest, question answering and text summarization - stand to benefit
    from being able to use text meaning in their processing. But the bulk of
    work in the field has not, over the years, pertained to treatment of
    meaning. The main reason given is the complexity of the task of
    comprehensive meaning analysis.

    Our field, of course, has never been entirely uninterested in meaning.
    The tradition of formal semantics has been continuously maintained for
    many years. Knowledge representation inside AI has come up with a large
    number of proposals concerning the metalanguages that could be used to
    formally represent text meaning. A variety of general and special (e.g.,
    space- or time-related) logical and common-sense reasoning systems have
    been developed that facilitate inference making on the basis of the
    representation of "literal" meaning obtained from text. Much work has
    been devoted to building practical, increasingly broad-coverage
    meaning-oriented analysis and synthesis systems. Lexical semantics has
    made significant progress in theories, description, and processing.
    Formal aspects of ontology work have also been studied. The Semantic Web
    has further popularized the need for automatic extraction,
    representation, and manipulation of text meaning: for the Semantic Web
    to really succeed, capability of automatically marking text for content
    is essential, and this cannot be attained reliably using only
    knowledge-lean, semantics-poor methods.

    Recently, there has been a flurry of specialized meetings devoted to
    formal semantics, lexical semantics, semantic web, formal ontology and
    others. But the number of meetings devoted to knowledge-based text
    meaning processing - content rather than formalism - has been much
    smaller. This workshop will begin to remedy that.

    Suggested Topics
    The workshop invites papers that relate to (but are not necessarily
    limited to) the following topics:
            
    * Broad-coverage semantic analysis
    * Knowledge-based text synthesis
    * The nature of text meaning required for various practical
    broad-coverage applications
    * Pragmatics and discourse issues as parts of text meaning extraction
    and manipulation
    * Ontologies supporting automatic processing of text meaning
    * Semantic lexicons
    * Language- and world-related microtheories designed to support text
    meaning extraction and manipulation: aspect, modality, reference, etc.
    * Text meaning representations in semantic analysis
    * Reasoning to support semantic analysis and synthesis
    * Multilingual aspects of meaning representation and manipulation
    * Integrating semantic analysis and non-semantic language processing
    * The benefits (if any) to semantic analysis and synthesis systems from
    knowledge-lean stochastic corpus-oriented methods.

    We encourage discussion of theoretical issues that are relevant to
    computational applications, including descriptions of processors and
    static knowledge resources. We specifically prefer discussions of
    meaning content over discussions of formalisms for its encoding and
    discussions of decision heuristics in processing over discussions of
    generic processing architectures and theorem proving mechanisms.

    This workshop will be not only a forum for presenting complete work with
    tangible results (even though this will be encouraged) but also an
    opportunity to:

    1. take stock of the developments in the field;
    2. assess the nature of the most pressing extant problems and reasons
    for current lack of satisfactory solutions;
    3. re-assess the potential contributions from developments outside the
    field (e.g., work on formal ontologies or corpus-based methods); and
    4. coordinate and plan future work.

    Submission Procedure

    Submit papers (not to exceed 8 pages in the HLT/NAACL two-column format)
    electronically, PDF strongly preferred, to sergei@umbc.edu.

    Deadlines

    Paper submission March 17, 2003
    Notification of acceptance March 31, 2003
    Camera-ready version due April 10, 2003
    Workshop date May 31, 2003

    Questions

    Direct inquiries to either of the organizers, sergei@umbc.edu and
    gh@cs.toronto.edu.

    Program Committee

    Stephen Beale University of Maryland, Baltimore County
    Lynn Carlson US Department of Defense
    Sanda Harabagiu University of Texas at Dallas
    Jerry Hobbs USC Information Sciences Institute
    Nancy Ide Vassar College
    Richard Kittredge University of Montreal
    Tanya Korelsky CoGenTex, Inc.
    Marjorie McShane University of Maryland, Baltimore County
    Dan Moldovan University of Texas at Dallas
    Martha Palmer University of Pennsylvania
    James Pustejovsky Brandeis University
    Victor Raskin Purdue University
    Yorick Wilks Sheffield University



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 12 2003 - 21:01:48 MET