Corpora: LREC2002 Workshop on Parsing Evaluation - 2nd CFP

From: John Carroll (johnca@cogs.susx.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Jan 22 2002 - 10:37:45 MET

  • Next message: John Carroll: "Corpora: LREC2002 Workshop on Parsing Evaluation - 2nd CFP"

                            Call for Papers

                            Beyond PARSEVAL
      -- Towards Improved Evaluation Measures for Parsing Systems --

                 http://let.dfki.uni-sb.de/BeyondPARSEVAL/

                          LREC 2002 Workshop
                              2nd June
                     Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain

    OVERVIEW

    The PARSEVAL metrics for evaluating the accuracy of parsing systems have
    underpinned recent advances in stochastic parsing with grammars learned
    from treebanks (most prominently the Penn Treebank of English). However,
    a new generation of parsing systems is emerging based on different
    underlying frameworks and covering other languages. PARSEVAL is not
    appropriate for many of these approaches: the NLP community therefore
    needs to come together and agree on a new set of parser evaluation
    standards.

    BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION

    In line with increasing interest in fine-grained syntactic and semantic
    representations, stochastic parsing is currently being applied to
    several high level syntactic frameworks, such as unification-based
    grammars, tree-adjoining grammars and combinatory categorial grammars. A
    variety of different types of training data are being used, including
    dependency annotations, phrase structure trees, and unlabelled text.
    Other researchers are building parsing systems using shallower
    frameworks, based for example on finite-state transducers. Many of these
    novel parsing approaches are using alternative evaluation measures --
    based on dependencies, valencies, or exact or selective category match
    -- since the PARSEVAL measures (of bracketing match with respect to
    atomic-labelled phrase structure trees) cannot be applied, or are
    uninformative.

    The field is therefore confronted with a lack of common evaluation
    metrics, and also of appropriate gold standard evaluation corpora in
    languages other than English. We need a new and uniform scheme for
    parser evaluation that covers both shallow and deep grammars, and allows
    for comparison and benchmarking across different syntactic frameworks
    and different language types.

    A previous LREC-hosted workshop on parser evaluation in 1998 (see
    <http://ceres.ugr.es/~rubio/elra/parsing.html>) brought together a
    number of researchers advocating parser evaluation based on dependencies
    or grammatical relations as a viable alternative to the PARSEVAL
    measures.

    The aim of this workshop is to start an initiative by bringing together
    four relevant parties:

      - researchers in symbolic and stochastic parsing
      - builders of annotated corpora
      - representatives from different syntactic frameworks
      - groups with interests in and proposals for parser evaluation

    The workshop will provide a forum for discussion with the aim of
    defining a new parser evaluation metric; we also intend the workshop to
    kick off a sustained collaborative effort into building or deriving
    sufficiently large evaluation corpora, and possibly training corpora
    appropriate to the new metric. To maintain the momentum of this
    initiative we will work towards setting up a parsing competition based
    on new standard evaluation corpora and evaluation metric.

    TOPICS OF INTEREST

    The workshop organisers invite papers focussing on:

      - benchmarking the accuracy of individual parsing systems
      - parser evaluation
      - design of annotation schemes covering different languages and
        grammar frameworks
      - creation of high-quality evaluation corpora

    Papers on the following topics will be particularly welcome:

      - descriptions of experiments using alternative evaluation measures
        with existing (stochastic or symbolic) parsers, focussing on
        comparison and discussion of qualitative differences

      - methods for creation of evaluation (or training) corpora, allowing
        flexible adaptation to a new evaluation standard based on
        dependencies or grammatical relations

      - comparisons of existing or possible new schemes for dependency-based
        evaluation (differences, similarities, problems)

    MODE OF ORGANISATION

    The one-day workshop will consist of (30-minute) paper presentations, a
    panel session, and an extended open session at which important results
    of the workshop will be summarised and discussed.

    As a follow-up, we hope to arrange a half-day meeting outside the
    workshop format to discuss concrete action plans, create working groups,
    and plan future collaboration.

    WORKSHOP ORGANISERS

    John Carroll University of Sussex, UK
    Anette Frank DFKI GmbH, Saarbruecken, Germany
    Dekang Lin University of Alberta, Canada
    Detlef Prescher DFKI GmbH, Saarbruecken, Germany
    Hans Uszkoreit DFKI GmbH and Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany

    PROGRAM COMMITTEE

    Salah Ait-Mokhtar XRCE Grenoble
    Gosse Bouma Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
    Thorsten Brants Xerox PARC
    Ted Briscoe University of Cambridge
    John Carroll University of Sussex
    Jean-Pierre Chanod XRCE Grenoble
    Michael Collins AT&T Labs-Research
    Anette Frank DFKI Saarbruecken
    Josef van Genabith Dublin City University
    Gregory Grefenstette Clairvoyance, Pittsburgh
    Julia Hockenmaier University of Edinburgh
    Dekang Lin University of Alberta
    Chris Manning Stanford University
    Detlef Prescher DFKI Saarbruecken
    Khalil Sima'an University of Amsterdam
    Hans Uszkoreit DFKI Saarbruecken and Saarland University

    SUBMISSIONS

    Abstracts for workshop contributions should not exceed two A4 pages
    (excluding references). An additional title page should state: the
    title; author(s); affiliation(s); and contact author's e-mail address,
    as well as postal address, telephone and fax numbers.

    Submission is by email, preferably in Postscript or PDF format, to:

      John.Carroll@cogs.susx.ac.uk

    to arrive by 1st February 2002. Abstracts will be reviewed by at least 3
    members of the program committee.

    Formatting instructions for the final full version of papers will be
    sent to authors after notification of acceptance.

    IMPORTANT DATES

      1 February 2002 deadline for receipt of abstracts
      22 February 2002 notification of acceptance
      12 April 2002 camera-ready final version for workshop proceedings

      2 June 2002 workshop

    TIME AND LOCATION OF THE WORKSHOP

    The workshop will take place on 2nd June, following the main LREC 2002
    Conference, in the Palacio de Congreso de Canarias, Las Palmas, Canary
    Islands.

    WORKSHOP REGISTRATION

    The registration fee for the workshop is:

      If you are also attending LREC: 90 EURO
      If you are not attending LREC: 140 EURO

    All attendees will receive a copy of the workshop proceedings.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 22 2002 - 10:43:09 MET