Re: Corpora: Is corpus phonetics a part of corpus linguistics?

From: Alex Chengyu Fang (alex_chengyu@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Fri Jan 04 2002 - 15:52:27 MET

  • Next message: Nina Wacholder: "Corpora: Estimating corpus size from incomplete text fragments."

    By "corpus phonetics", I'd understand it as a study
    based on a corpus of "recorded speech", therefore a
    rather redundant expression since phonetics is
    traditionally much of a field study. You may find
    interesting an ICAME article by Haliday which mentions
    the pioneering efforts by his teacher Wang Li to
    construct a corpus of recorded Cantonese Chinese.

    Your own study seems to be one based on derived
    indications from authography or transcribed speech
    that relate themselves indirectly to phonetic
    features. If so, it's certainly part of corpus
    linguistics but needs a more self-evident name,
    something like "text-based phonetics", which,
    admittedly, sounds a bit mutually exclusive.

    Alex

     --- Yuri Tambovtsev <yutamb@mail.cis.ru> wrote: >
    Dear colleagues, recently there was a discussion
    > what the corpus linguistics is. Some scholars wanted
    > to write a deskbook on corpus linguistics. I noticed
    > that many linguists understand it in a narrow way:
    > just as corpus lexicology, rather than corpus
    > linguistics. I propose to consider corpus phonetics
    > as a part of corpus linguistics. By corpus phonetics
    > I understand the part of corpus linguistics which
    > studies phonetical features that become transparent
    > when the text in some language is long enough. I
    > have computed many long texts in different
    > languages. It allowed me to obtain some interesting
    > typological results on the one hand and corpus
    > results on the other hand. If the text is not long
    > enough, one can't obtain corpus phonetics results.
    > I'd like the colleagues in the field of corpus
    > linguistics to share their ideas if one should
    > include corpus phonetics in corpus linguistics or if
    > corpus linguistics should include only corpus
    > lexicology and corpus syntax? If not, how should
    > long transcription texts be called? Why not corpus
    > phonetics? Looking forward to your answers to my
    > email address yutamb@hotmail.com Yours sincerely
    > Yuri Tambovtsev, Novosibirsk Ped.University, Russia
    >

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Everything you'll ever need on one web page
    from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
    http://uk.my.yahoo.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 04 2002 - 15:52:56 MET