Dear All,
How wonderful to see that the empiricist/theoricist debate is going live and
strong on the Corpus (or should it be Corpora) Linguistics chat room.
I am just completing a PhD which is using corpora, statistical methods and
computers - any two of which in combination just a few years ago would have
seemed unthinkable. I am facing real problems though in finding linguists or
computer scientists to accept that using real data holds any advantages over
a purely theoretical approach. Finding a panel for my viva has proved almost
impossible due to this and the fact that I am looking at phonological
acquisition in non Indo European languages!
I have always maintained linguistics should take into account the evidence
that is all around us in the form of ambient language. Is this such a
strange view point to hold?
Am I missing something here but what other fields ignore the evidence. Maybe
50 years ago before the advent of computers as we know them today a
non-empirical approach could be justified but surely not now? Generative
linguists please reply in your defence!!!!
Anyway just thought I would put my bit in about how pleased I am to see that
others are at last debating this important issue.
On another note could someone please send me the 3 earliest messages on this
subject as my e-mail went into a black hole for a few days.
S. Warren - UK
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 05 2001 - 10:55:23 MET DST