Corpora: Language Engineering

From: Geoffrey Sampson (geoffs@cogs.susx.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 18 2000 - 10:39:55 MET

  • Next message: Anna Vacalopoulou: "Corpora: LREC-2000 Workshop Announcement and Call for Participation"

    I haven't been following this series of messages as carefully as I might,
    but unless I have missed an earlier mention it might be worth pointing out
    that the most recent issue of the journal _Natural Language Engineering_
    includes an article (by someone at the University of Sheffield, I think)
    on exactly this question -- the history and usage of the term "language
    engineering". In response to Tim Buckwalter in particular, I think
    of "language engineering" and "computational linguistics" as reasonably
    clearly distinct: in the usage that seems to be current among people
    I interact with, "computational linguistics" is a pure academic subject
    involving computer models of natural languages aiming at discovering more
    about the nature of language and the nature of human cognitive abilities,
    while "language engineering" is concerned with computing developments whose
    principal motive is to contribute to practical, industrially or socially
    valuable natural-language-processing systems (even if the work done now
    is sometimes only remotely or indirectly linked to the realization of
    such systems in the future).

    It is also worth commenting that there seems to be a European/American
    difference in usage. "Language Engineering" was used officially as a label
    for a major sector of European Union research funding under the recently
    concluded Framework IV research programme, so that Europeans naturally
    found themselves using this term -- in some contexts they _had_ to use it --
    and it commonly occurred as an acronym, LE. Under the new Framework V
    programme, the relevant EU Directorate-General has instead adopted what I
    think of as the American phrase "Human Language Technology". It will be
    interesting to see whether this leads to the term LE fading out of usage.
    I hope not: I find it a very convenient and attractive concept, and
    Human Language Technology is to my mind an ugly replacement.

    Prof. Geoffrey Sampson

    School of Cognitive & Computing Sciences
    University of Sussex
    Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, GB

    e-mail geoffs@cogs.susx.ac.uk
    tel. +44 1273 678525
    fax +44 1273 671320
    Web site http://www.grs.u-net.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 18 2000 - 10:39:44 MET