RE: Corpora: "language engineering"

From: Doug Cooper (doug@th.net)
Date: Fri Feb 18 2000 - 07:53:35 MET

  • Next message: Geoffrey Sampson: "Corpora: Language Engineering"

    "Language engineering" (nee "text hacking" circa late 1970's, then
    briefly "natural language understanding") is none other than natural
    language processing, engaged in a brave attempt at regaining its
    respectability after an lengthy stint as the doxy of AI. The breakdown
    of the relationship may be traced to the long public humiliation NLP
    endured during the "AI gap" era of the mid 1980's (the heyday of the
    Japanese Fifth Generation computing project and the US Strategic
    Computing Initiative).

        The term "engineering" is just one element of an extended metaphor --
    which includes terms like "tools" and "workbench" -- used to add a sense
    of vigor and brawn to work in this area. The alternative "computational
    linguistics," although common within the field as an appropriate description
    of much of the logical evolution of text hacking, is apparently not quite
    sexy
    enough for universal acceptance -- possibly because the pause requred to
    explain the meanings of both "computational" and "linguistics" to potential
    supporters tends to kill any mood conducive to providing funding.

       In the above sense, the word "engineering" should be recognized as
    a marker of social register, largely bleached of its original semantics. It
    enjoyed a vogue in the 1970's as a means of raising the social status of
    one's employment , but was overused to such an extent that the phrase
     'X engineering' or 'I'm a Y engineer' became a guaranteed laugh line,
    and the term lost favor in polite company, much like the extended pinky
    of an earlier era. It occasionally reappears in the research findings of the
    cosmetics industry (eg. 'rehydration engineering'), as reported in many
    fashion industry journals, and regularly summarized in The Journal of
    Irreproducible Results.

      A parallel usage, as an adjective meaning 'imposed from above in
    accordance with firm principles of pseudo-science,' became popular at
    roughly the same time, particularly in the phrase 'social engineering.'
    It is
    almost invariably found in close collocation with such terms as "attempts at"
    and "failed." Many researchers have pointed out the unintended irony
    found in the frequent pejorative use of "social engineering" in papers
    whose letterheads include the (apparently non-judgemental) term "social
    science."

       In closing, I should point out that the field of text hacking has
    undergone
    sweeping changes in the past 25 years, as evidenced by the replacement
    of awk, grep, and sed with Perl, and the universal substitution of the hash
    for
    the associative array. Surely, the great historical figures (Kernighan,
    Lesk,
    Cherry, et al) would hardly know what to make of our modern science.

      Yours in discourse,
      Doug Cooper
    __________________________________________________
              1425 VP Tower, 21/45 Soi Chawakun
            Rangnam Road, Rajthevi, Bangkok, 10400
        doug@th.net (662) 246-8946 fax (662) 246-8789

      Southeast Asian Software Research Center, Bangkok
      http://seasrc.th.net --> SEASRC Web site
      http://seasrc.th.net/sealang --> SEALANG Web site



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 18 2000 - 07:56:05 MET