Corpora: corpus-archive revisited

Vladimir Rykov (rykov@iling.msk.su)
Thu, 10 Dec 98 10:11:11 +0300

Let me invade in corpus-archive discussion with just a pair of
words in support of Dr Mason's position.

The term "corpus" that we use as specialists and the word
"corpus" defined in Oxfords have smth common. But they (common words
and terms) are different realities - as human beings and dolls - or
take any other comparison.

If we try to define the difference between terms "corpus (C)" and
"el. archive - (EA)" - then - I think the starting point should be
somewhere here. The purpose, function or anything of archive is to
store, save info (texts) and make them available. This is its main
idea.
C is a kind of supertext. In the beginning of ANY text is idea.
It is true for C. I compile my C according to my (research) idea - ask
people for proper sources (EA, books, etc). I can find EA that totally
matches my idea - then it is my luck.
If my C is good and other people need it - it can become EA.
These two terms have smth in common - but sometimes there is a
difference.
I want to write a love letter. I can find the proper one in a
special book, or take the proper passages from it or write it totally
myself. The initial idea is mine.
Sorry - it is not a pair of words
---
YS Vladimir Rykov, PhD in Computational Linguistics
www.blkbox.com/~gigawatt/rykov.html Linguistic Institute
WWW.GOL.RU/~iling 1/12 B.Kislovsky per., Moscow, 103009
M_M_M_M_M_M_M_M_M_M_M_M KREMLIN WALL IS WHERE YOU MAKE IT !